SAN DIEGO, CA - SEPTEMBER 18: Dean Spanos, Owner of the San Diego Chargers, looks on from the sidelines against the Jacksonville Jaguars during the first half of a game at Qualcomm Stadium on September 18, 2016 in San Diego, California. (Photo by Donald Miralle/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Dean Spanos

Report: The Chargers' owner is so mad it pretty much ensures the team is leaving San Diego

San Diego politicians make ridiculous offer to Chargers owner, and now he definitely wants to move the team

A proposal that San Diego Chargers owner Dean Spanos says on the surface might look like a last-ditch effort by local politicians to keep the team around has only infuriated him and all but guaranteed his plans to relocate.

According to Deadspin, Spanos was embarrassed after receiving a letter on Tuesday from four city council members offering a 99-year lease at an annual cost of $1 per year, while the Chargers and the NFL would be expected to foot the bill for the building and maintenance costs of a new stadium.

The letter, which was also sent to the NFL, read in part:

The current site is equivalent to over 60 downtown blocks that can be transformed from an empty parking lot to a state-of-the-art, one of a kind NFL experience. The development of the current site with a $1 per year 99-year lease would be a good starting point for a discussion.

An anonymous source close to the situation asserts that Spanos sees the offer as a way of diverting blame for the Chargers' move, while also humiliating him and his family.

"If the goal was to infuriate the single remaining decision-maker in this process, mission accomplished," the source said.

RELATED: Broncos defender gave his opponent the most unlikely threat and shut him up for good

At first glance, the proposal may appear to be a valid attempt at keeping the franchise in San Diego, but the costs associated with running and maintaining such a stadium make the idea seem as absurd as Spanos is suggesting.

The team currently pays around $15 million per year in operating costs, not to mention another $100 million in deferred maintenance projects sits on the table.