We finally have a challenger in the most embarrassing “championship rings” discussion Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images
MIAMI GARDENS, FL - OCTOBER 08: Head coach Jimbo Fisher of the Florida State Seminoles looks on during a game against the Miami Hurricanes at Hard Rock Stadium on October 8, 2016 in Miami Gardens, Florida. (Photo by Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images)

Just last summer we ripped Florida State for creating “championship rings” after they won 10 games and beat in-state rivals to run the state of Florida. They went on to lose the Chick-Fil-A Bowl and it just came off as a participation trophy of sorts following years of success.

This year, Kentucky’s rings are giving the ‘Noles a run for their money.

Kentucky certainly can’t match Florida State for their history of football success, but the Wildcats handed out rings for a winning season, beating Louisville in the regular season and making, (not winning), making a Bowl game. Oh yeah, they lost that Bowl game as well, 33-18, to the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets.

The Wildcats hadn’t had a winning season since 2009 and it was their first Bowl performance since 2010.

But hopping one game over .500 doesn’t warrant championship rings. Stop the participation trophy culture. Kentucky seems to be on the right path — they were in the running to make the SEC championship game in the second half of the season. Wait it out and hand out awards when they’re deserved.

Prashad is the Senior Content Editor for Cox Media Group's He considers Muhammad Ali, Ray Allen and Paul Pierce some of the all-time greats. Boston is TitleTown, in case you were wondering.
View More Articles

Stories You Might Like