RedZone used to be the holy grail of football viewing. Seven straight hours of commercial-free action. Not anymore, and fans are directing their fury at ESPN, whether it deserves it or not.
Videos by FanBuzz
Photo Illustration by Sheldon Cooper/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
The premium channel, which costs between $11 and $15 a month, began airing advertisements this season. RedZone host Scott Hanson confirmed the change, and the response online was instant.
"Awesome work ESPN/NFL!! You got greedy and ruined a good product!!" one X user wrote in a post that topped 1.4 million views. Another joked, "We should make Cracker Barrel look like a PTA meeting in our response to this whole commercials on RedZone nonsense."
The wrinkle is that RedZone is still operated by the NFL. ESPN owns NFL Network, but the league continues to produce the broadcast — meaning the outcry aimed at Bristol might be misdirected.
The NFL itself said the move had been "contemplated and tested for over a year" and stressed it was "completely unrelated" to ESPN's involvement.
if they’re adding commercials it shouldn’t be a premium channel anymore
i paid for redzone to not watch commercials, if you’re going to show them anyway, i will simply not pay for your channel!!
Awesome work ESPN/NFL!! You got greedy and ruined a good product!! https://t.co/KShdqMTMMw
— Coopuhr 🌩️ (@Coopuhr) September 3, 2025
Still, the optics are messy. Pat McAfee tried to calm the waters, saying, "I don't think anybody's upset about the commercials ... I don't think anybody's turning it off because of commercials." Fans clearly disagreed, with some even floating boycotts.
The NFL insists ads will be "limited" and that game action will remain visible in other boxes during breaks. But RedZone's selling point has always been its purity: wall-to-wall football. And for plenty of fans, once that streak was broken, so was the trust.
